Title |
Understanding intrinsic challenges to STEM instructional practices for Chinese teachers based on their beliefs and knowledge base
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of STEM Education, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40594-020-00245-0 |
Authors |
Yan Dong, Jing Wang, Yunying Yang, Premnadh M. Kurup |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
Lecturer | 17 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
Researcher | 11 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 32 | 15% |
Unknown | 99 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 34 | 16% |
Mathematics | 12 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 11 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 3% |
Engineering | 6 | 3% |
Other | 37 | 18% |
Unknown | 104 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,745,728
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#319
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,047
of 401,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.