↓ Skip to main content

Boring bivalve traces in modern reef and deeper-water macroid and rhodolith beds

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Boring bivalve traces in modern reef and deeper-water macroid and rhodolith beds
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00356-w
Authors

Davide Bassi, Juan C. Braga, Masato Owada, Julio Aguirre, Jere H. Lipps, Hideko Takayanagi, Yasufumi Iryu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 24%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,941,451
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#138
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,698
of 399,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.