↓ Skip to main content

Orfeo ToolBox: open source processing of remote sensing images

Overview of attention for article published in Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Orfeo ToolBox: open source processing of remote sensing images
Published in
Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40965-017-0031-6
Authors

Manuel Grizonnet, Julien Michel, Victor Poughon, Jordi Inglada, Mickaël Savinaud, Rémi Cresson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Student > Master 32 17%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 17%
Environmental Science 30 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 14%
Engineering 18 10%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards
#26
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,539
of 330,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.