↓ Skip to main content

Mixing Apples and Oranges and Other Methodological Problems with a Meta-Analysis of Long Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Social Work Journal, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Mixing Apples and Oranges and Other Methodological Problems with a Meta-Analysis of Long Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
Published in
Clinical Social Work Journal, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10615-010-0297-y
Authors

Monica Pignotti, David Albright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Argentina 1 5%
Unknown 20 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 64%
Social Sciences 6 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,101,602
of 4,504,869 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#237
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,477
of 78,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,504,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 52nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.