↓ Skip to main content

Are per-incident rape-pregnancy rates higher than per-incident consensual pregnancy rates?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 550)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
117 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Are per-incident rape-pregnancy rates higher than per-incident consensual pregnancy rates?
Published in
Human Nature, March 2003
DOI 10.1007/s12110-003-1014-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan A. Gottschall, Tiffani A. Gottschall

Abstract

Is a given instance of rape more likely to result in pregnancy than a given instance of consensual sex? This paper undertakes a review and critique of the literature on rape-pregnancy. Next, it presents our own estimation, from U.S. government data, of pregnancy rates for reproductive age victims of penile-vaginal rape. Using data on birth control usage from the Statistical Abstract of the United States, we then form an estimate of rapepregnancy rates adjusted for the substantial number of women in our sample who would likely have been protected by oral contraception or an IUD. Our analysis suggests that per-incident rape-pregnancy rates exceed per-incident consensual pregnancy rates by a sizable margin, even before adjusting for the use of relevant forms of birth control. Possible explanations for this phenomenon are discussed, as are its implications to ongoing debates over the ultimate causes of rape.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#237,773
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#24
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171
of 63,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them