↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Stochastic ground motion simulation of the 2016 Meinong, Taiwan earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Earth Planets and Space, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Stochastic ground motion simulation of the 2016 Meinong, Taiwan earthquake
Published in
Earth Planets and Space, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40623-017-0645-z
Authors

Chun-Te Chen, Shun-Chiang Chang, Kuo-Liang Wen

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 24%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,743,179
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Earth Planets and Space
#1,110
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,020
of 311,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth Planets and Space
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.