Title |
Neurally plausible mechanisms for learning selective and invariant representations
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13408-020-00088-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fabio Anselmi, Ankit Patel, Lorenzo Rosasco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 27% |
Psychology | 1 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,625,509
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#36
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,987
of 400,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.