↓ Skip to main content

Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Global and Arctic effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic gases and aerosols in MRI-ESM2.0
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40645-020-00348-w
Authors

Naga Oshima, Seiji Yukimoto, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Koshiro, Hideaki Kawai, Taichu Y. Tanaka, Kohei Yoshida

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 33%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Engineering 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,826,304
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#133
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,293
of 429,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.