↓ Skip to main content

Wellbeing in the Making: Peoples’ Experiences with Wearable Activity Trackers

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Wellbeing in the Making: Peoples’ Experiences with Wearable Activity Trackers
Published in
Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13612-016-0042-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evangelos Karapanos, Rúben Gouveia, Marc Hassenzahl, Jodi Forlizzi

Abstract

Wearable activity trackers have become a viable business opportunity. Nevertheless, research has raised concerns over their potentially detrimental effects on wellbeing. For example, a recent study found that while counting steps with a pedometer increased steps taken throughout the day, at the same time it decreased the enjoyment people derived from walking. This poses a serious threat to the incorporation of healthy routines into everyday life. Most studies aim at proving the effectiveness of activity trackers. In contrast, a wellbeing-oriented perspective calls for a deeper understanding of how trackers create and mediate meaningful experiences in everyday life. We present a study of real life experiences with three wearable activity trackers: Fitbit, Jawbone Up and Nike + Fuelband. Using need fulfillment as a theoretical lens, we study recent, memorable experiences submitted by 133 users of activity trackers. We reveal a two-dimensional structure of users' experience driven by the needs of physical thriving or relatedness. Our qualitative findings further show a nuanced picture of the adoption of activity trackers and their impact on wellbeing. For instance, while reflection about own exercising practices lost its relevance over time, users continued to wear the tracker to document and collect their runs. More than just supporting behavioral change, we find trackers to provide multiple psychological benefits. For instance, they enhance feelings of autonomy as people gain more control about their exercising regime. Others experience relatedness, when family members purchase a tracker for relatives and join them in their efforts towards a better, healthier self. The study highlights that activity trackers can be more than "tools" to change behavior. Through incorporation in daily life, they offer new social experiences, new ways of boosting our self-esteem and getting closer to our ideal selves.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 259 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 17%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 14%
Computer Science 33 12%
Design 27 10%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 6%
Other 65 24%
Unknown 63 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,395,571
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice
#12
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,840
of 368,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.