↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation in acute heart failure edema secondary to acute coronary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation in acute heart failure edema secondary to acute coronary syndrome
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a170
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Canovas, A Lopez, DO Torres, A Burruezo, L Capilla, A Carrillo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,992,712
of 7,902,020 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#87
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,326
of 267,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,902,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.