↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note: Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of Senna occidentalis (L.) leaves Extract

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Retraction Note: Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial activities of Senna occidentalis (L.) leaves Extract
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40816-016-0028-1
Authors

Oluwakayode Odeja, Grace Obi, Christiana Ene Ogwuche, Elias Emeka Elemike, Yemi Oderinlo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Chemistry 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,266,546
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#24
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,492
of 343,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.