↓ Skip to main content

Harmonising data systems for cash transfer programming in emergencies in Somalia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Harmonising data systems for cash transfer programming in emergencies in Somalia
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41018-020-00077-1
Authors

Boniface Owino

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 27%
Decision Sciences 1 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Energy 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,456,119
of 17,663,872 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#68
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,732
of 301,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,663,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them