Title |
Harmonising data systems for cash transfer programming in emergencies in Somalia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41018-020-00077-1 |
Authors |
Boniface Owino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 4 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 16% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 12% |
Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,865,266
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#99
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,606
of 398,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.