Title |
Usefulness of suPAR as a biological marker in patients with systemic inflammation or infection: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2613-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yara Backes, Koenraad F. van der Sluijs, David P. Mackie, Frank Tacke, Alexander Koch, Jyrki J. Tenhunen, Marcus J. Schultz |
Abstract |
Systemic levels of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) positively correlate with the activation level of the immune system. We reviewed the usefulness of systemic levels of suPAR in the care of critically ill patients with sepsis, SIRS, and bacteremia, focusing on its diagnostic and prognostic value. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 23% |
Unknown | 37 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 42 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,081,970
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,657
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,651
of 170,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.