↓ Skip to main content

Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s10195-020-00547-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hasan May, Yusuf Alper Kati, Gurkan Gumussuyu, Tuluhan Yunus Emre, Melih Unal, Ozkan Kose

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Other 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 41 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Engineering 6 7%
Materials Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 47 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,731,480
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#57
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,220
of 399,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them