↓ Skip to main content

Original composition and formation process of slab-derived deep brine from Kashio mineral spring in central Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Original composition and formation process of slab-derived deep brine from Kashio mineral spring in central Japan
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40623-020-01225-y
Authors

Fumitake Kusuhara, Kohei Kazahaya, Noritoshi Morikawa, Masaya Yasuhara, Hidemi Tanaka, Masaaki Takahashi, Yuki Tosaki

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 38%
Computer Science 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,618,818
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#951
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,693
of 399,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#35
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.