| Title |
The role of theology in current evolutionary reasoning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, October 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00138329 |
| Authors |
Paul A. Nelson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 7 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#141
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,087
of 28,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them