| Title |
Correction to: Predictive validity of a novel non-invasive estimation of effective shunt fraction in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-020-00320-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma M. Chang, Andrew Bretherick, Gordon B. Drummond, J. Kenneth Baillie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,533,914
of 23,798,792 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#333
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,434
of 399,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,798,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.