↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
793 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1
Authors

Bevo Wahono, Pei-Ling Lin, Chun-Yen Chang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 793 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 793 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 89 11%
Student > Master 64 8%
Student > Bachelor 47 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 2%
Other 71 9%
Unknown 467 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 89 11%
Mathematics 49 6%
Physics and Astronomy 22 3%
Chemistry 19 2%
Computer Science 17 2%
Other 117 15%
Unknown 480 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#388
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,000
of 432,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.