| Title |
Development of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system to aid the management of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-020-00223-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek Kyte, Nicola Anderson, Ram Auti, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Jon Bishop, Andrew Bissell, Elizabeth Brettell, Melanie Calvert, Marie Chadburn, Paul Cockwell, Mary Dutton, Helen Eddington, Elliot Forster, Gabby Hadley, Natalie J. Ives, Louise Jackson, Sonja O’Brien, Gary Price, Keeley Sharpe, Stephanie Stringer, Gael Stephenson, Rav Verdi, Judi Waters, Adrian Wilcockson, Jim Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,639,704
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#90
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,199
of 396,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.