| Title |
Spontaneous breathing, transpulmonary pressure and mathematical trickery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00708-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciano Gattinoni, John J. Marini, Mattia Busana, Davide Chiumello, Luigi Camporota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Argentina | 6 | 5% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Colombia | 5 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 99 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 13% |
| Scientists | 9 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 47% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#506,854
of 25,972,223 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#46
of 1,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,382
of 432,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,972,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.