↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid model for analysis of abnormalities in diabetic cardiomyopathy and diabetic retinopathy related images

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Hybrid model for analysis of abnormalities in diabetic cardiomyopathy and diabetic retinopathy related images
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2152-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahimuddin Shaik, Anil Kumar Sharma, Syed Musthak Ahmed

Abstract

At present image processing methods hold a noteworthy position in unravelling various medical imaging challenges. The high risk disorders such as diabetic cardiomyopathy and diabetic retinopathy are considered as applications for proposed method. The dictum of this paper is on observing enhancement and segmentation of the cross sectional view of a blood capillary of a right coronary artery image of a diabetic patient and also retinal images. A hybrid model using hybrid morphological reconstruction technique as pre-processing with watershed segmentation method as post-processing is developed in this work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,462,696
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,261
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,057
of 299,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#108
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.