↓ Skip to main content

An optimization routing protocol for FANETs

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
An optimization routing protocol for FANETs
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13638-019-1442-0
Authors

Hua Yang, Zhiyong Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 28 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 31%
Engineering 12 21%
Unknown 28 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#296
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,559
of 365,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.