| Title |
Ethical dilemmas due to the Covid-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00702-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
René Robert, Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Alexandre Boyer, Alexandra Laurent, Elie Azoulay, Jean Reignier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 36% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 517 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 17% |
| Unknown | 209 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 6% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 75 | 15% |
| Unknown | 223 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,991,004
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#394
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,156
of 434,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.