↓ Skip to main content

Personalized symptom management: a quality improvement collaborative for implementation of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in ‘real-world’ oncology multisite practices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Personalized symptom management: a quality improvement collaborative for implementation of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in ‘real-world’ oncology multisite practices
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00212-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doris Howell, Zeev Rosberger, Carole Mayer, Rosanna Faria, Marc Hamel, Anne Snider, Denise Bryant Lukosius, Nicole Montgomery, Mindaugas Mozuraitis, Madeline Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 16%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 26 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Psychology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,798,540
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#100
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,959
of 399,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.