↓ Skip to main content

Bread, milk and a Tattslotto ticket: the interpretive repertoires of young adult gambling in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Bread, milk and a Tattslotto ticket: the interpretive repertoires of young adult gambling in Australia
Published in
Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40405-016-0013-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maree Ann Nekich, Keis Ohtsuka

Abstract

The discourse of Australian young adults who gamble regularly was analysed to explore key dilemmas and challenges of a generation who grew up with the positive and negative impacts of gambling advertisements. Qualitative interviews of seven young recreational gamblers who regularly frequent gaming machine venues were conducted. The discourse that they used to describe their gambling involvement, motivation, development and subjective views were analysed and three central repertoires: 'Culture not self,' 'If it makes you happy,' and 'No problem here!' were identified. The current findings demonstrate the participants' attempts to understand and legitimise their gambling. Further, it was suggested that young adults face a series of dilemmas when deciding whether to gamble and to what extent they gamble. Their discourse highlights the tension between individual agency, societal expectations and familial influence. The respondents primarily gambled for social reasons in a manner which they perceived as culturally acceptable. The importance of harm minimization and public awareness campaigns directed at young adults was also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 11%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,121,779
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#10
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,979
of 338,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them