↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Solutions of the Dirichlet-Schrödinger problems with continuous data admitting arbitrary growth property in the boundary

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 189)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Solutions of the Dirichlet-Schrödinger problems with continuous data admitting arbitrary growth property in the boundary
Published in
Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13662-016-0751-4
Authors

Jianjie Wang, Jun Pu, Ahmed Zama

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,597,909
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models
#12
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,947
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them