| Title |
Transfer of metals from soil to vegetables and possible health risk assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-385 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yeasmin Nahar Jolly, Ashraful Islam, Shawkat Akbar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 90 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 53 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 29 | 10% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 103 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,613,813
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#504
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,971
of 197,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#19
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.