Title |
“Lost at the starting line”: a reconsideration of educational inequality in China, 1978–2008
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40711-016-0028-z |
Authors |
Junchao Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 47% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,299,622
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#19
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,219
of 335,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Chinese Sociology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.