↓ Skip to main content

Effects of bariatric surgery on inspiratory muscle strength

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Effects of bariatric surgery on inspiratory muscle strength
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1088-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sjaak Pouwels, Marieke Kools-Aarts, Mohammed Said, Joep A W Teijink, Frank W J M Smeenk, Simon W Nienhuijs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 28%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 24%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,620,796
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,468
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,766
of 263,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#76
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.