↓ Skip to main content

The full spectrum of climate change adaptation: testing an analytical framework in Tyrolean mountain agriculture (Austria)

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
The full spectrum of climate change adaptation: testing an analytical framework in Tyrolean mountain agriculture (Austria)
Published in
SpringerPlus, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3542-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidelinde Grüneis, Marianne Penker, Karl-Michael Höferl

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,921,351
of 21,347,791 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#483
of 1,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,867
of 305,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them