↓ Skip to main content

The Value of Preseason Screening for Injury Prediction: The Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prognostic Model to Predict Indirect Muscle Injury Risk in Elite Football (Soccer…

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine - Open, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 474)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
79 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
The Value of Preseason Screening for Injury Prediction: The Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prognostic Model to Predict Indirect Muscle Injury Risk in Elite Football (Soccer) Players
Published in
Sports Medicine - Open, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40798-020-00249-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Hughes, Richard D. Riley, Michael J. Callaghan, Jamie C. Sergeant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 34 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 35 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#584,734
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#46
of 474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,900
of 394,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.