| Title |
Duration of prone position sessions: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00683-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastien Jochmans, Sandie Mazerand, Jonathan Chelly, Franck Pourcine, Oumar Sy, Nathalie Thieulot-Rolin, Olivier Ellrodt, Emmanuelle Mercier Des Rochettes, Gaël Michaud, Jean Serbource-Goguel, Christophe Vinsonneau, Ly Van Phach Vong, Mehran Monchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | 50% |
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 19% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,193,902
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#750
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,183
of 392,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#33
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.