Title |
Sepsis at ICU admission does not decrease 30-day survival in very old patients: a post-hoc analysis of the VIP1 multinational cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00672-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mercedes Ibarz, Ariane Boumendil, Lenneke E. M. Haas, Marian Irazabal, Hans Flaatten, Dylan W. de Lange, Alessandro Morandi, Finn H. Andersen, Guido Bertolini, Maurizio Cecconi, Steffen Christensen, Loredana Faraldi, Jesper Fjølner, Christian Jung, Brian Marsh, Rui Moreno, Sandra Oeyen, Christina Agwald Öhman, Bernardo Bollen Pinto, Ivo W. Soliman, Wojciech Szczeklik, Andreas Valentin, Ximena Watson, Tilemachos Zaferidis, Bertrand Guidet, Antonio Artigas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,432,513
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#644
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,638
of 388,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#24
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.