| Title |
Accuracy assessment and error analysis for diameter at breast height measurement of trees obtained using a novel backpack LiDAR system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forest Ecosystems, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40663-020-00237-0 |
| Authors |
Yuyang Xie, Jie Zhang, Xiangwu Chen, Shuxin Pang, Hui Zeng, Zehao Shen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| China | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 27% |
| Engineering | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,179,141
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#167
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,441
of 416,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.