↓ Skip to main content

Musculoskeletal Lower Limb Injury Risk in Army Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine - Open, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Musculoskeletal Lower Limb Injury Risk in Army Populations
Published in
Sports Medicine - Open, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40798-016-0046-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberley A. Andersen, Paul N. Grimshaw, Richard M. Kelso, David J. Bentley

Abstract

Injuries are common within military populations, with high incidence rates well established in the literature. Injuries cause a substantial number of working days lost, a significant cost through compensation claims and an increased risk of attrition. In an effort to address this, a considerable amount of research has gone into identifying the most prevalent types of injury and their associated risk factors. Collective evidence suggests that training and equipment contribute to a large proportion of the injuries sustained. In particular, the large loads borne by soldiers, the high intensity training programs and the influence of footwear have been identified as significant causative factors of lower limb injury in military populations. A number of preventative strategies have been developed within military bodies around the world to address these issues. The relative success of these strategies is highly variable; however, with advancements in technology, new approaches will become available and existing strategies may become more effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 40 18%
Engineering 33 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 76 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,112,207
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine - Open
#308
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,131
of 299,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine - Open
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.