| Title |
Bias of shear wave elasticity measurements in thin layer samples and a simple correction strategy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-2937-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jianqiang Mo, Hao Xu, Bo Qiang, Hugo Giambini, Randall Kinnick, Kai-Nan An, Shigao Chen, Zongping Luo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,804,094
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#305
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,168
of 357,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#52
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.