↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of Curing Regimes for Precast Prestressed Members with Early-Strength Concrete

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Optimization of Curing Regimes for Precast Prestressed Members with Early-Strength Concrete
Published in
International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40069-016-0154-7
Authors

Songhee Lee, Ngocchien Nguyen, Thi Suong Le, Chadon Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Student > Master 4 20%
Other 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 35%
Materials Science 3 15%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
#8
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,874
of 352,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them