↓ Skip to main content

Angiogenic factors in peritoneal adhesion formation

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 160)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Angiogenic factors in peritoneal adhesion formation
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10397-006-0236-7
Authors

Carlos Roger Molinas, Maria Mercedes Binda, Philippe Robert Koninckx

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#41
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,247
of 67,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them