| Title |
A soft stretchable bending sensor and data glove applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Robotics and Biomimetics, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40638-016-0051-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhong Shen, Juan Yi, Xiaodong Li, Mark Hin Pei Lo, Michael Z. Q. Chen, Yong Hu, Zheng Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,348,084
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Robotics and Biomimetics
#1
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,224
of 418,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Robotics and Biomimetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them