↓ Skip to main content

HCOC: a cost optimization algorithm for workflow scheduling in hybrid clouds

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Internet Services and Applications, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
HCOC: a cost optimization algorithm for workflow scheduling in hybrid clouds
Published in
Journal of Internet Services and Applications, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13174-011-0032-0
Authors

Luiz Fernando Bittencourt, Edmundo Roberto Mauro Madeira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
China 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 143 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 32%
Student > Master 34 22%
Researcher 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 95 63%
Engineering 16 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,424
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Internet Services and Applications
#75
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,625
of 120,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Internet Services and Applications
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.