| Title |
Systematic review and literature appraisal on methodology of conducting and reporting critical-care echocardiography studies: a report from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine PRICES expert panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00662-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Huang, F. Sanfilippo, A. Herpain, M. Balik, M. Chew, F. Clau-Terré, C. Corredor, D. De Backer, N. Fletcher, G. Geri, A. Mekontso-Dessap, A. McLean, A. Morelli, S. Orde, T. Petrinic, M. Slama, I. C. C. van der Horst, P. Vignon, P. Mayo, A. Vieillard-Baron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Mexico | 3 | 7% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Librarian | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,229,387
of 23,738,567 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#136
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,895
of 378,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,738,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.