Title |
Procedural complications of inferior vena cava filter retrieval, an illustrated review
|
---|---|
Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s42155-020-00113-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Keith B. Quencer, Tyler A. Smith, Amy Deipolyi, Hamid Mojibian, Raj Ayyagari, Igor Latich, Rahmat Ali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
India | 1 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 25% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 18% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 39% |
Philosophy | 1 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,230,476
of 25,246,334 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#66
of 396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,836
of 382,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,246,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 396 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.