↓ Skip to main content

Urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] and serum procalcitonin to predict and assess the risk for short-term outcomes in septic and non-septic critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Urinary [TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7] and serum procalcitonin to predict and assess the risk for short-term outcomes in septic and non-septic critically ill patients
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00665-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilaria Godi, Silvia De Rosa, Francesca Martino, Simona Bazzano, Marina Martin, Elisa Boni, Maria Rosa Carta, Claudia Tamayo Diaz, Gaia Mari, Anna Lorenzin, Massimo de Cal, Valentina Corradi, Carlotta Caprara, Davide Giavarina, Claudio Ronco

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Other 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 46%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,076,075
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#797
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,775
of 374,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.