↓ Skip to main content

Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STEM Education, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Boundary crossing pedagogy in STEM education
Published in
International Journal of STEM Education, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40594-020-00212-9
Authors

Allen Leung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Lecturer 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Researcher 12 5%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 91 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 21%
Mathematics 14 5%
Arts and Humanities 13 5%
Computer Science 10 4%
Physics and Astronomy 10 4%
Other 55 22%
Unknown 99 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,605,323
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#289
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,625
of 374,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.