| Title |
Therapeutic strategies for critically ill patients with COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00661-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lei Li, Ranran Li, Zhixiong Wu, Xianghong Yang, Mingyan Zhao, Jiao Liu, Dechang Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 20% |
| Mexico | 6 | 13% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 442 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 10% |
| Researcher | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 122 | 28% |
| Unknown | 112 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 16% |
| Unknown | 134 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,480,928
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#166
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,900
of 404,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.