↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Gastrointestinal perforation: clinical and MDCT clues for identification of aetiology

Overview of attention for article published in Insights Into Imaging, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Gastrointestinal perforation: clinical and MDCT clues for identification of aetiology
Published in
Insights Into Imaging, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13244-019-0823-6
Pubmed ID
32086627
Authors

Styliani Pouli, Androniki Kozana, Ioanna Papakitsou, Maria Daskalogiannaki, Maria Raissaki

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Other 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Unspecified 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 36 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 34%
Unspecified 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 39 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,786,645
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Insights Into Imaging
#288
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,343
of 361,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights Into Imaging
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.