Title |
Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00658-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gustavo A. Ospina-Tascón, Jean-Louis Teboul, Glenn Hernandez, Ingrid Alvarez, Alvaro I. Sánchez-Ortiz, Luis E. Calderón-Tapia, Ramiro Manzano-Nunez, Edgardo Quiñones, Humberto J. Madriñan-Navia, Juan E. Ruiz, José L. Aldana, Jan Bakker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 18% |
Colombia | 5 | 9% |
Mexico | 5 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
Malaysia | 3 | 5% |
Chile | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 4% |
Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 27% |
Scientists | 6 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 14% |
Researcher | 13 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 19% |
Unknown | 47 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 45% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 50 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#972,475
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#106
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,952
of 387,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.