Title |
Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00659-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arnaldo Dubin, Cecilia Loudet, Vanina S. Kanoore Edul, Javier Osatnik, Fernando Ríos, Daniela Vásquez, Mario Pozo, Bernardo Lattanzio, Fernando Pálizas, Francisco Klein, Damián Piezny, Paolo N. Rubatto Birri, Graciela Tuhay, Analía García, Analía Santamaría, Graciela Zakalik, Cecilia González, Elisa Estenssoro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Argentina | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 51% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#13,676,273
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#720
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,101
of 375,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.