↓ Skip to main content

Positive thinking: An unfair burden for cancer patients?

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Positive thinking: An unfair burden for cancer patients?
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00343919
Authors

Cynthia N. Rittenberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 40%
Researcher 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Philosophy 1 10%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,772,890
of 12,390,159 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,569
of 2,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,152
of 119,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,390,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.