| Title |
Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-020-00859-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eliseo Vano, Guy Frija, Wolfram Stiller, Efstathios Efstathopoulos, Claudio Granata, Reinhard Loose, Graciano Paulo, Dean Pekarovic, Johan Sjöberg, Lluís Donoso-Bach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 3 | 50% |
| France | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 15% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,748,762
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#389
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,254
of 373,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.